Legal Opinion

Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 19, 2003No. C8-03-119PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Respondent employee brought an action against appellant employer under Minn. Stat. § 181.79 (2000) after appellant, without respondent’s consent, deducted the amount necessary to repay a loan from respondent’s accrued salary. Appellant counterclaimed for interest on the loan. The district court denied appellant’s counterclaim and awarded respondent twice the amount of the deduction as provided by law. Because we conclude that the district court did not err by determining that respondent violated Minn.Stat. § 181.79, we affirm.

FACTS

In November 1990, respondent John Brekke…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. O'MALLEY v. Ulland Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Niccum v. Hydra Tool Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Nadeau v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Chatfield v. HendersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Brekke v. THM Biomedical, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API