Legal Opinion

County of Mendocino v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1899No. S. F. No. 1154PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County and from an order denying a new trial. S. K. Dougherty, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an action brought by the county of Mendocino against J. E. Johnson, formerly its tax collector, and against the sureties upon his official bond, to recover the sum of $3,000, moneys which it is alleged were collected by the tax collector and not accounted for by him in accordance with law. The cause was tried by a jury, which rendered a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $2,886.80. From the judgment which followed, and from the order denying defendants a new trial, they prosecute these appeals.

The complaint alleged that the defendant Johnson, as tax collector, on and after the first…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Wetmore v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marysville Development Co. v. HargisIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Dirks v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Snodgrass v. SnodgrassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. Turlock Irrigation District v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Hughes v. WachterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API