Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Wachter

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1931No. File No. 5880Published

1OpinionBurr, J.

(On rehearing). The plaintiff asked for a rehearing to determine the questions of burden of proof as to payment and the status of the books of the corporation, and a re-hearing was granted.

It is claimed that non-payment need not be alleged, because payment is an affirmative defense.

The general rule is that non-payment must be alleged in the complaint where failure to pay is an essential element of the cause of action “as for example; in an action on a contract, the breach of which consists of non-payment.” 48 C. J. 665. See also Lent v. New York & M. R. Co. 130 N. Y. 504, 29 N. E. 988, 989;…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. McKyring v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Lent v. New York & Massachusetts Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Knapp v. . RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Hubler v. PullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API