Hughes v. Wachter
North Dakota Supreme Court
1OpinionBurr, J.
(On rehearing). The plaintiff asked for a rehearing to determine the questions of burden of proof as to payment and the status of the books of the corporation, and a re-hearing was granted.
It is claimed that non-payment need not be alleged, because payment is an affirmative defense.
The general rule is that non-payment must be alleged in the complaint where failure to pay is an essential element of the cause of action “as for example; in an action on a contract, the breach of which consists of non-payment.” 48 C. J. 665. See also Lent v. New York & M. R. Co. 130 N. Y. 504, 29 N. E. 988, 989;…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- McKyring v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
- Lent v. New York & Massachusetts Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Knapp v. . RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Hubler v. PullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.