Turlock Irrigation District v. Edwards
California Supreme Court
A. J. Carlson and Stanley Pedder for Appellants in Sac. No. 4116. P. H. Griffin and Boone & Boone for Respondent in Sac. No. 4116. P. H. Griffin and Griffin, Boone & Boone for Appellant in Sac. No. 3957.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above-entitled actions, consolidated for purposes of trial and appeal, were brought to recover money alleged to have been misappropriated by the defendant Edwards while serving simultaneously as tax collector and treasurer, respectively, of the plaintiff irrigation district. That there existed a shortage of $18,612.58, the amount sued for in each complaint, in Edwards’ accounts at the time of his resignation from these offices in September, 1923, is not now disputed. So far as the defendant Edwards himself is concerned, both offices having been united in him, it is a matter of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Gabriel F. IrvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
- Anaheim Union Water Co. v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- County of Mendocino v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by1 opinion
- Calistoga National Bank v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935