Legal Opinion

Dirks v. California Safe Deposit & Trust Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1902No. S.F. No. 2789PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Plaintiff and Sarah L. Dirks were husband and wife; he was an old man, and she was a young woman; she died testate on March 21, 1900. On March 19, 1896, at San Francisco, they entered into the following written agreement :—

“Agreement between John J. Dirks and S. L. Dirks.
“I, John J. Dirks, transfer to my wife two thousand dollars, part of my money in the Humboldt Savings Bank on March 19, 1896, the interest to being drawn every six months for family use, and that I, S. L. Dirks, will not take this two thousand dollars out of the bank or banks before my husband's consent or before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Tuohy v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Bagnall v. RoachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  4. County of Mendocino v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dickey v. KuhnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Bryan v. Capital Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Hosang v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Washington v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Radebaugh v. Citizens Trust & Savings Bank, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API