Marysville Development Co. v. Hargis
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.
— Appellant through mesne conveyances became the owner of what was commenced as a Carey Irrigation system and brought suit to foreclose because of nonpayment a water right contract issued by the original company to respondent’s assignor. Respondent denied that anything was due and unpaid on the contract and claimed overpayment of $58.54, which appellant admitted to the extent of $20.73 as an offset against the amount claimed to be due. From judgment for respondent entered by the court after trial without a jury the appeal was taken.
The records of one of the intermediary companies introduced…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fawcett v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
- Cunningham v. SpringerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1905
- Wetmore v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Dreyfus v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
- C. S. Brackett Co. v. LofgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gholson v. SavinOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Shore v. PetersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Reynolds Irr. Dist. v. SproatIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
- Weisel v. BEAVER SPRINGS OWNERS ASS'N, INC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
- Ashby v. HubbardIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.