Legal Opinion
Department of Housing & Community Development v. Mullen
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 5, 2005No. 1691, September Term, 2003PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SALMON, Judge.
Jon and Sally Mullen (the “Mullens”) are curators of property known as Knock’s Folly, located in Kent County. The Mullens’ curatorship agreement, which is more fully described infra, provided that the Mullens personally would donate the funds necessary to restore and maintain Knock’s Folly. In exchange for their gift, the Mullens were permitted to live on Knock’s Folly rent and tax free, for the duration of their natural lives. 1
In 1974, the Commissioners of Kent County acquired ownership of Knock’s Folly. Kent County, in 1980, granted a conservation easement to the Maryland…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Evergreen Amusement Corp. v. MilsteadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Mass Transit Administration v. Granite Construction Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
- Hammaker v. SchleighCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Federal Land Bank of Baltimore, Inc. v. EshamCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Council of OakmontSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Dwoskin v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- In re G.P.-R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Liverpool Township v. StephensCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.