Hill v. Cross Country Settlement, LLC

The only thing that is crystal clear about this case is that the grant of summary judgment, on this record, was inappropriate. Although we cannot state conclusively that no conceivable set of facts that may be developed on remand, based on the analysis here, could support disposition of this dispute by summary judgment, we suggest that it is quite likely that this litigation presents triable issues.

I

Mary Sasso acquired the residential property at 533 S. Chester Street in Baltimore City (the “Property”) on 28 March 1991. Approximately six months later, she conveyed the Property to her…