Legal Opinion

Huntley & Huntley, Inc. v. Council of Oakmont

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 2009No. 30, 31 WAP 2008PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice SAYLOR.

This appeal by allowance requires an examination of the preemptive scope of Pennsylvania’s Oil and Gas Act. It also raises the separate question of whether the municipality should have granted a conditional use permit to drill a natural gas well on the residential property in question. This case and its companion, Range Resources-Appalachia v. Salem Township, 600 Pa. 231, 964 A.2d 869, 2009 WL 413748 (2009), present our first occasions to interpret the preemptive language contained in the act.

I. Background

Appellee Huntley & Huntley, Inc. (“Huntley”), an engineering…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Krentz v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  3. Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Board of County Commissioners v. Bowen/Edwards Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Rendell v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Delaware County v. First Union Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Hoffman Mining Co. v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API