Legal Opinion

Fearnow v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 9, 1996No. 70, Sept. Term, 1995PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KARWACKI, Judge.

The Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act (hereinafter “the Wiretap Act”), Maryland Code (1974, 1995 Repl.Vol., 1995 Cum.Supp.), § 10-401 et seq. of the Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article, protects persons in Maryland from surreptitious eavesdropping, wiretapping, and electronic surveillance by outlawing unauthorized non-consensual interception of wire, private oral, and electronic communications. The Wiretap Act also directs when and by whom such non-consensual interceptions may be authorized and the exact manner in which authorization may be given; it…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Prince George's County v. BlumbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Ritchie v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. Sergeant Co. v. PickettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  5. PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  3. Smith v. DanielczykCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. General Motors Corp. v. SeayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Mitchell v. AARP Life Insurance ProgramCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API