Legal Opinion

Hammaker v. Schleigh

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 21, 1929No. [No. 5, October Term, 1929.]PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPabke, J.

C. Frank Schleigh, a builder and contractor, agreed with George W. Hammaker to reconstruct the latter’s building in Hagerstown; and, in an action at law by the builder and contractor against the owner to recover for work and labor done as a result of this contract, the plaintiff obtained a verdict of $3,275.33, .but the court directed the entry .of a remittitur damna to $2,800, and a judgment was rendered for this amount. The record presents sixteen exceptions.. The first fifteen are to the rulings on evidence. The plaintiff offered no- prayer, and the case was submitted to the jury on the…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. SpearinSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Faber v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Beatty v. Trailmaster Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  2. Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. St. Joseph Hospital v. Corbetta Construction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Traylor v. GraftonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Bohnert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API