Avina v. Spurlock
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN (G. A.), J.
In this case the central issue is whether the trial court erred as a matter of law in awarding $501 as nominal damages. We have concluded that $501 is far in excess of the amount that can. legally constitute nominal damages and modify the judgment accordingly.
The suit was commenced by the plaintiff tenants for wrongful eviction and wrongful detention of personal property from leased premises against the defendant landlords. The court, sitting without a jury, found the plaintiffs had been unlawfully evicted and that defendants unlawfully detained plaintiffs’ personal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Price v. McComishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sterling Drug, Inc. v. BenatarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Broads v. Mead and CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Bettolo v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Maher v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Delia S. v. TorresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Roberson v. C.P. Allen Constr. Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Boston LLC v. JuarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Crane-McNab v. County of MercedDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Genisman v. Carley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.