Legal Opinion

Maher v. Wilson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1903No. S.F. No. 2775PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

Action for false imprisonment. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendants appeal therefrom and from an order denying a new trial.

Defendants are members of the firm of Wilson Brothers & Co., engaged in dealing in lumber in the city of San Francisco, and in January, 1900, procured a cargo of lumber to be shipped to them from a northern port by the Hale & Kern Contracting Company, of Portland, Oregon, on their barge, at a specified rate per thousand feet. The lumber was measured at the shipping port, but there was some dissatisfaction with the measurement, and it was agreed between Wilson…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beckwith v. BeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Kennedy v. North Missouri RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Price v. McComishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Singleton v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. Broads v. Mead and CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bettolo v. Safeway Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Crystal Dome Oil & Gas Co. v. SavicIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API