Legal Opinion
Price v. McComish
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 20, 1937No. Civ. 11264PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, P. J.
The only point that is presented by appellant, who was the plaintiff in the court below, is that in view of the evidence that was adduced on the trial of the action and the findings of fact that were made thereon by the trial court, the judgment that was rendered in his favor for the sum of $200 lacked legal support.
In effect, the complaint contained the allegation that by reason of a wanton physical attack that was made by defendant on plaintiff, the latter had suffered damages in the aggregate sum of $10,783. And by the findings of fact the trial court declared:
“That all the allegations of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mahoney v. BeatmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Pearl v. PearlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Donnatin v. Union Hardware & Metal Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918
- Broads v. Mead and CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Farrar v. FarrarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Blanton v. Womancare, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
- Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- John O. England, Trustee of the Estate of Irene Mansfeldt, Bankrupt v. Morgan J. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Fairfield v. American Photocopy Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.