Legal Opinion
Crane-McNab v. County of Merced
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 28, 2011No. CIV. 1:08-1218 WBS SMSPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
This action involves land owned by plaintiffs, 1 which they allege has been contaminated by a neighboring landfill operated by the Merced County (“County”). The court held a four-day bench trial, lasting from January 24, 2011, to January 27, 2011. This memorandum constitutes the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a).
I. Factual and Procedural History
Plaintiffs own approximately 4500 acres of land (“Crane property”) in Merced County to the west of Highway 59. Highway 59 is part of…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- (PS) Lewis v. Synchrony BankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Didak v. Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Lillywhite v. AECOMDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Peyre v. McGareyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.