Legal Opinion
Genisman v. Carley
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided October 16, 2018No. H042543PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELIA, ACTING P. J.
*47In this legal malpractice action, appellant Robert Genisman alleges his former attorneys, Hopkins Carley and Mark Heyl (collectively respondents), were negligent in their representation of him in connection with the 2005 sale of his ownership interest in two private companies (the Transaction). Genisman alleges the Transaction initially was structured as a buyout and respondents restructured it as a redemption *783without properly advising him regarding that change. As a result, Genisman alleges, he was sued for failing to properly disclose the nature of the Transaction to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Peregrine Funding, Inc. v. Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Block v. Raines Feldman LLP CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020
- In Re: Kevan Harry GilmanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Jackson v. City of ModestoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Klein v. Hughes CA2/6California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Kumar v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.