Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Boysen

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1975No. 34219PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] OPINION

Plaintiff Ethel Harvey commenced an action for damages for injuries sustained in the course of her employment by the County of Contra Costa, alleged to have been proximately caused by the negligence of defendant Edwin Boysen. The injuries had caused her to lose a substantial amount of time from her employment. During trial the action was settled by payment to her of $21,000.

A Contra Costa County ordinance numbered 36-8.1402 provided that any permanent…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Heaton v. KerlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adler v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Abdala v. AzizCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Dailey v. Dallas Carriers Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Eli v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Duncan v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API