Legal Opinion
Dailey v. Dallas Carriers Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 12, 1996No. B088962PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
YEGAN, J.
A California resident, Timothy Dailey, employed by an Ohio corporation, was killed while working in California. Dailey’s employer paid workers’ compensation benefits in the amount required by California law. Dailey’s survivors (survivors) have claimed workers’ compensation benefits only in Ohio. At the time of the injury, the States of Ohio and California had conflicting rules wih respect to an employer’s right to reimbursement from a third party tortfeasor for workers’ compensation benefits. Ohio did not allow reimbursement. (Cincinnati Bell Telephone. Co. v. Straley (1988)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alaska Packers Assn. v. Industrial Accident Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Carroll v. LanzaSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Crider v. Zurich InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matthews v. National Football League Management CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Tucci v. Club Mediterranee, SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Benoit v. Test Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Maxim Crane Works, L.P. v. Tilbury ConstructorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Federal Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.