Legal Opinion

Eli v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 27, 1987No. B021615PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GATES, J.

By the instant action the parties sought a declaration determining how a limited recovery from a third-party tortfeasor who caused another’s death should be divided between (1) the victim’s nondependent heirs who were damaged by his death, and (2) a workers’ compensation insurance carrier who had paid monies to the State of California by reason of that death. This apparently constituted a question of first impression. The trial court ruled that the carrier’s claim was entitled to first and full priority. This appeal followed.

With one exception the underlying facts…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Breese v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Changaris v. MarvelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Travelers Insurance v. Sierra Pacific AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Pacific Southwest AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gapusan v. JayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Daniels v. Hi-Way Truck Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Fremont Compensation Insurance v. Sierra Pine, LTD.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Gapusan v. JayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API