Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Kerlan

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1946No. L. A. 19477PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Respondent Esther Heaton fractured her left arm in the course of her employment as a masseuse. Her employer carried workmen’s compensation insurance with appellant Associated Indemnity Corporation, and respondent was treated by a doctor selected by appellant. The doctor, without taking an X-ray of respondent’s arm, diagnosed and treated for a sprain. The arm did not knit, and by the time another doctor discovered the fracture, it became necessary to remove the head of the radius, and the arm was permanently disabled.

On January 20, 1942, respondent brought an action against the doctor for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ash v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Matter of Parchefsky v. Kroll Bros., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Blackwell v. American Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Unruh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Stewart v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Reinert v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. D'Angona v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API