Legal Opinion
Robert S, FURR, Leslie Woosley, Bernard E. Ozinga, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 1, 1996No. 95-6181PublishedCited by 134 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellees Robert S. Furr, Leslie Woosley, and Bernard E. Ozinga allege that their employment with Defendant-Appellant Seagate Technology, Inc. was terminated because of their age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-34, and Oklahoma public policy. 1 The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of the Plaintiffs. Seagate filed a motion for judgment as a matter of law or a new trial, which was denied by the district court. This appeal followed.
I. Background
Seagate designs, manufactures…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Sharon G. CONE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LONGMONT UNITED HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, a Colorado Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Branson v. Price River Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Jewel BURRUS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED TELEPHONE COMPANY OF KANSAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- Coleman v. Quaker Oats Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- William Radue v. Kimberly-Clark CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Terry N. Garrett v. Hewlett-Packard Company, a California Company Authorized to Do Business in the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.