Legal Opinion
Aramburu v. The Boeing Company
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 5, 1997No. 96-3032PublishedCited by 411 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Santiago Aramburu appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment on all claims in favor of Defendants The Boeing Company and Larry Whitesell. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After reviewing the district court’s memorandum opinion, the briefs on appeal, and the record provided us, we affirm the grant of summary judgment. However, with respect to several claims we affirm using a different analysis from that applied by the district eourt. 1
Aramburu filed this employment action to recover damages and secure equitable relief under Title VII of…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Patterson v. McLean Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by411 opinions
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Kendrick v. Penske Transportation Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Jandreau v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
406 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.