Legal Opinion
Terry N. Garrett v. Hewlett-Packard Company, a California Company Authorized to Do Business in the State of Colorado
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 25, 2002No. 01-1022PublishedCited by 350 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Terry Garrett brought the present action against his former employer, Hewlett-Packard (HP), alleging race and age discrimination in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq. Hewlett-Packard filed a motion seeking sum mary judgment on all claims. The district court granted the motion except as to Mr. Garrett’s claim that the company failed to raise his pay for discriminatory reasons, which the parties subsequently settled. Mr. Garrett appeals, asserting the district court…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by350 opinions
- Khalik v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Pahls v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Johnson v. Weld County, Colo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Ann Garrison Pamela Bielski Vicky Dunbar Teresita Wells Connie Brady Sherry Conway Patricia Erickson v. Gambro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Tabor v. Hilti, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
345 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.