Legal Opinion

Kantorosinski Chiropractic, Inc. v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided September 27, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreco, P.J.

In this matter involving the payment of personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits pursuant to G.L.c. 90, §34M, Kantorosinski Chiropractic, Inc. (“Kantorosinski”) has appealed the allowance of summary judgment in favor of the PIP insurer, Plymouth Rock Assurance Corporation (“Plymouth Rock”). The case arose out of a relatively minor accident in which Francisco Delasnueces (“Francisco”) and his wife, Gloria Delasnueces (“Gloria”), were injured. It would appear that the car in which they were riding was owned by Gloria and insured by Plymouth Rock. Both husband and wife received treatment from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  3. Smith v. MassimianoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Metro West Medical Associates, Inc. v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
  5. Boehm v. Hanover InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Norfolk & Dedham GroupMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013
  2. Essex Chiropractic Office v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2012
  3. Duffy v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API