Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Amica Mutual Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided August 16, 2013Published

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

This appeal arises from a claim for personal injury protection (“PIP”) benefits filed by the medical provider for services provided to the defendant’s insured. Summary judgment for the defendant was entered, and the plaintiff has appealed the allowance of the defendant’s Mass. R. Civ. P, Rule 56, motion.

The defendant-appellee, Arnica Mutual Insurance Company (“Arnica”), provided PIP coverage to one Cormier, who was injured in a motor vehicle accident on April 17, 2005. Arnica requested Cormier to submit to a medical examination to be performed by Dr. Ronald E. Rosenthal (“Rosenthal”).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  3. Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Mejia v. American Casualty Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  5. Metro West Medical Associates, Inc. v. Amica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API