Boehm v. Hanover Insurance
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.
This is an appeal of the allowance of summary judgment in favor of the defendant-insurer, Hanover Insurance Company (“Hanover”), on the G.L.c. 90, §34M claim by the plaintiff-chiropractor, Ian J. Boehm, D.C. (“Boehm”), for Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) payment of medical bills.
On March 19,2006, Norman Landano (“Landano”) sustained injuries in an automobile collision while an occupant of a vehicle insured by Hanover under a standard Massachusetts automobile policy. Boehm treated Landano for his injuries from March 21,2006 through August 22,2006, generating medical bills totaling…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pederson v. Time, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. SCA Services, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Fascione v. CNA Insurance CompaniesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Opara v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Boone v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kantorosinski Chiropractic, Inc. v. Plymouth Rock Assurance Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2011
- Barron Chiropractic & Rehabilitation, P.C. v. Premier Insurance Co. of MassachusettsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Fairfield Equine Associates PC v. SafranMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010
- Genest v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010