Legal Opinion

Price v. Northern Bond & Mortgage Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1931No. 22804. Department TwoPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

The parties to this proceeding are in agreement as to most of the facts, the questions in dispute being questions of law. The facts out of which the legal questions arise are substantially as follows:

In November, 1926, one Hensel, together with his wife, executed and delivered to the Northern Bond & Mortgage Company (hereinafter referred to as the mortgage company) their certain promissory note for seven thousand dollars, secured by real estate mortgage upon property which presumably was wholly adequate as security. This mortgage was duly recorded. Within a few days thereafter, the mortgage…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Murphy v. BarnardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
  2. Parmenter v. OakleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  3. Erickson v. KendallWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. People's Trust Co. v. TonkonogyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Blunt v. NorrisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Second National Bank of New Haven v. DyerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  2. In Re Columbia Pacific Mortgage, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1981
  3. Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bremerton Creamery & Produce Co. v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Beckmann v. WardWashington Supreme Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API