Legal Opinion
Stohr v. Randle
Washington Supreme Court
Decided February 1, 1973No. 42483PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.
The defendant-appellant, Art Randle, d/b/a Art Randle Motor Co., is appealing from a judgment of the Pierce County Superior Court which awarded $6,000 to the respondent, Clarence Stohr, in a tort action for conversion of an automobile owned by the respondent.
The facts of this case can be briefly summarized as follows: In August of 1969, Clarence Stohr purchased a new Cadillac, Coup DeVille sedan, and signed the certificate of title to the vehicle in the place and in the manner prescribed for the sale of the automobile. Apparently this was to allow his son to take immediate possession of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Safe Deposit, Sav. & Trust Co. of DC v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Linn v. ReidWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- West Coast Airlines, Inc. v. Miner's Aircraft & Engine Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
- Koppler v. BuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Frye & Co. v. BoltmanWashington Supreme Court · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Henderson Homes, Inc. v. City of BothellWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Sorenson v. PyeattWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Sorenson v. PyeattWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- Atlas Building Supply Co. v. First Independent BankCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
- Puget Sound Bank v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.