Stockdale v. Horlacher
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The plaintiff brought this action for a judgment upon a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage by which the note was secured. The defendant Albert Horlacher answered by general denial. Other defendants pleaded affirmatively the statute of limitations. A trial to the court without a jury resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff could not prevail. From the judgment entered dismissing the action as to all of the defendants, the plaintiff appeals.
The facts are these: December 29, 1924, the respondents Martin Horlacher and Walter Horlacher executed and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Bank of Montreal v. GuseWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Koppler v. BuggeWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Ellis v. SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Berteloot v. RemillardWashington Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. LeberWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Walker v. SiegWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Tragopan Properties, LLC v. Smith Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Wickwire v. ReardWashington Supreme Court · 1951
- Franklin v. Gilbert Ice Cream Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.