Uren v. Dakota Dust-Tex, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MARING, Justice.
[¶ 1] Paul Uren has appealed from a summary judgment dismissing his action against Dakota Dust-Tex, Inc. (“Dakota”) for damages resulting from a fire in a building leased to Dakota by Uren. We conclude that (1) Dakota was an implied co-insured under Uren’s property insurance policy and subrogation was therefore barred; (2) Dakota was not hable for lost rents; (3) Dakota was not liable for Uren’s insurance deductible and travel expenses to view the damaged building; and (4) an attorney’s travel expenses to attend a pretrial product inspection were not recoverable as costs or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Rodenburg v. Fargo-Moorhead Young Men's Christian Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Fleck v. ANG Coal Gasification Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Vanderhoof v. Gravel Products, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Heng v. Rotech Medical Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Hager v. City of Devils LakeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- American National Fire Insurance Co. v. HughesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Riemers v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- N.D. Dep't of Transportation v. SchmitzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.