Arcsoft, Inc. v. Cyberlink Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD, FOURTH, AND SIXTH CAUSES OF ACTION AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
WILLIAM H. ORRICK, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
This is a trademark infringement action involving competing self-portrait photo (“selfie”) editing applications (“apps”). Plaintiff ArcSoft, Inc. (“ArcSoft”) is the developer of the “Perfect365” selfie editing app. It accuses defendants Cyberlink Corp. (“CyberLink”), and its two subsidiaries, defendants Perfect Corp., a California corporation (“Perfect California”), and Perfect Corp., a Cayman…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Mazurek v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Theta Chi Fraternity, Inc. v. Leland Stanford Junior UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Ossur hf v. Manamed Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
- F19 Franchising, LLC v. Endo Fitness LL, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- F19 Franchising, LLC v. Endo Fitness LL, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Five Star Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Fresh Express, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.