Legal Opinion
Ossur hf v. Manamed Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 27, 2017No. SACV 17-01015 JVS (DFMxPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtJames V. Selna, District Judge
Plaintiffs Ossur hf and Ossur Americas Inc. (collectively, "Ossur"), moved for a preliminary injunction. Mot., Docket No. 11-1. Defendants Manamed Inc. ("Manamed"), Spartamed LLC ("Spartamed"), John Lasso ("Lasso"), Trevor Theriot ("Theriot"), and Joseph Horton ("Horton") (collectively, "Defendants") opposed. Opp'n, Docket No. 16. Ossur replied. Reply, Docket No. 18.
For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion.
BACKGROUND
I. Request for Judicial Notice
A court may take judicial notice of facts that are readily determinable from accurate sources. Fed. R. Evid. 201(b)(2). Judicial notice…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Gard v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019