Legal Opinion
F19 Franchising, LLC v. Endo Fitness LL, LLC
District Court, C.D. California
Decided June 11, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00185Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 O 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 F19 FRANCHISING, LLC, a California limited Case No.: 2:23-cv-00185-MEMF-JC 11 liability company; F-19 HOLDINGS, LLC, a 12 Delaware limited liability company, DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF NO. 71] 13 Plaintiffs, v. 14 ENDO FITNESS LL, LLC, a California limited 15 liability company; ENDO FITNESS 3, LLC, a 16 California limited liability company, ENDO FITNESS, LLC, a California limited liability 17 company; ROBERT RODGER, individually; PAUL RICE, individually; PAUL INFALD, 18 individually; and ADAM OSBORN,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Manzarek v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.