Legal Opinion

Woodward v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1926No. 19653. En BancPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, C. J.

— Appellant, as plaintiff, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the driver of a motor bus operated by the city of Seattle as a part of its municipally-owned street railway system. A demurrer having been sustained to his complaint, upon the theory that the operation of the bus was ultra vires, appellant filed an amended complaint, pleading, in addition to the facts originally alleged, the city ordinance pursuant to which the bus was operated. A demurrer was again interposed and sustained, the plaintiff elected to stand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. PitneyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  2. State ex rel. Huggins v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State ex rel. Hill v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Schwager-Nettleton Mills v. CarstensWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Barr v. Cowlitz CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Haslund v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Utah Rapid Transit Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Sigurdson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  4. City of Seattle v. WrightWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Coates v. Tacoma School District No. 10Washington Supreme Court · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API