Legal Opinion

Bradshaw v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1953No. 32400PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This case involves four causes of action arising from a collision between an automobile and a Northern Pacific locomotive. The driver of the car, George Bradshaw, and Thomas Matthews, as guardian ad litem of Daniel Lynn Fisher, a minor, seek recovery for property damage and personal injuries. Melvin De Vore, as administrator of the estate of his wife, Fae De Vore, seeks recovery for her wrongful death, on .behalf of himself and on behalf of her minor son, Daniel Lynn Fisher. Mrs. De Vore and her son were riding in the automobile as guests of Mr. Bradshaw when the collision occurred.

*770Defendants…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Kramer v. Portland-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Hutton v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Johnson v. Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Hagerman v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bohm v. RacetteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  2. Walker v. BignellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Nordstrom v. White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Jezek v. City of MidlandTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Owens v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API