Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. State Farm Insurance

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1974No. 42971PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

The petitioner, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, issued a public liability policy to the respondents, in which its liability was limited to $10,000 for injuries to any one person. The policy provided, in part:

[The company will] defend any suit against the insured alleging such bodily injury or destruction and seeking damages on account thereof, even if such suit is groundless, false or fraudulent; but the company may make such investigation, negotiation and settlement of any claim or suit as it deems expedient; . . .

An action within the scope of the policy was commenced against the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tyler v. Grange Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  2. Murray v. MossmanWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Burnham v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co. of NewarkWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Moore v. Mayfair Tavern, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Sigurdson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Chambers-Castanes v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Phil Schroeder, Inc. v. Royal Globe InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. FosterMississippi Supreme Court · 1988

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API