Legal Opinion
Busby v. Capital One, N.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 2011No. Civil Action 10-1025 (RMU)PublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Capital One’s Motion to Dismiss; Granting Prensky’s Motion to Partially Dismiss
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The pro se plaintiff, Wanda Busby, has asserted a variety of statutory and common law claims against the defendants, Capital One, N.A. (“Capital One”) and attorney David Prensky (“Prensky”), in connection with a promissory note and deed of trust executed by the plaintiff in 1996. Capital One has moved to dismiss all of the claims against it pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Prensky has also filed a motion pursuant to…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- APA Assessment Fee Litigation v. American Psychological Assoc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Demetra Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & AssociatCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Daniel Logan v. LaSalle Bank National AssociationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Judith CARTER, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Et Al., DefendantsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.