Legal Opinion

State v. Perry

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1984No. 836SC1002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

We summarily reject defendants’ first contention that their arrest warrants and subsequent indictments were issued without probable cause. By pleading and participating in the trial without ever making motions to quash, defendants waived their right to challenge the propriety of the issuance of the warrants and indictments. State v. Teasley, 9 N.C. App. 477, 176 S.E. 2d 838, cert. denied and appeal dismissed, 277 N.C. 459, 177 S.E. 2d 900 (1970); see G.S. 15A-952; G.S. 15A-955; State v. Lynch, 300 N.C. 534, 268 S.E. 2d 161 (1980) (a motion to dismiss an indictment is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. FergusonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  2. State v. ApplewhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. State v. WiseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API