Legal Opinion

State v. Applewhite

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 2008No. COA07-1399PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

Where defendant failed to request that a witness be qualified as an expert and made only a general objection to the contents of the witness’s testimony, defendant’s objection to the witness’s qualifications has not been preserved for appellate review. Where defendant made no offer of proof concerning excluded testimony, defendant has not preserved the issue for appellate review. Where decedent’s statements were admissible as an excited utterance, the trial court did not err in admitting the statements. Where the witness was adverse to the State, the trial court did not abuse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. CummingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  5. State v. AugustineSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. In re: D.R.J.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API