Legal Opinion
United States v. Hullum
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided April 25, 1983No. 42,615; NMCM No. 81 0112PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVERETT, Chief Judge:
A military judge, sitting as a special court-martial, tried appellant on a charge consisting of five specifications of unauthorized absence, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886. Contrary to his pleas, Hullum was found guilty with some exceptions as to dates, and was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for 4 months, and reduction to pay grade E-l. Although the judge recommended that Hullum’s discharge be suspended “if while in confinement the accused demonstrates and expresses a willingness to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. RivasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. RankinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
- United States v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. DormanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. Rodriguez-AmyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.