Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodriguez-Amy

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 14, 1985No. 45651; SPCM 16451PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLETCHER, Judge:

We are called upon in this case to determine whether denial of oral argument on sentence appropriateness before the United States Army Court of Military Review denied this appellant his due-process rights. 16 M.J. 134. Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was convicted at a special court-martial on May 12, 1981, of two specifications of adultery in circumstances both service discrediting and prejudicial to good order and discipline. This was in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934. The sentence awarded by the military judge consisted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Coppedge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Price v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. AkbarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2015
  2. United States v. SchneiderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. United States v. AugustUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. CurtisU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  5. United States v. StinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API