Legal Opinion
United States v. Miller
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided August 29, 2006No. 04-0799/NAPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge GIERKE
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This Court has granted review of three issues.1 The first issue addresses the duties of an appellate defense counsel to communicate with Appellant prior to submitting a *454case on the merits to the United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals. The second and third issues address the responsibility of trial defense counsel to inform a client of a collateral consequence of a court-martial conviction—that his guilty plea to possession of child pornography requires him to register as a sex offender. These two issues focus on whether…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. TalkingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. RoseUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2009
- Gonzales v. Commandant, United States Disciplinary BarracksDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.