Herron v. M. Rumley Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
. Error from District Court, Woodward County; R. H. Lóofbour-rozv, Judge. . Action by the M. Rumley Company against Millie P. Her-ron. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
1. The question of' the amending of the pleadings was within the sound discretion of the trial court. Its action thereon will not be disturbed on review here unless such discretion appears to have been abused. Alcorn et al. v. Dennis, 25 Okla. 135, 105 Pac. 1012.
The court offered to permit the defendant (plaintiff in error) to amend her answer on condition that she pay, or cause to be paid, the accrued costs. This she failed or declined to do. Section 5677, Comp. Laws 1909 (section 4015, Stat. Okla. Ter. 1893), provides:
“At any time within ten days after the demurrer is filed, the adverse…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Robinson v. GlassIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Moore v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Alcorn v. DennisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Hochstein v. BerghauserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Seeman v. BiemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Ely Walker Dry Goods Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. BrunerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Offutt v. WagonerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.