Legal Opinion

Offutt v. Wagoner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1911No. 1445PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from Ottawa County Court; W. V. Quigley, Judge. Action by W. A. Wagoner and another against D. A. Offutt and others for damages on an 'injunction bond. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

The first question raised by plaintiff in error is “that the law makes no provision for a bond to obtain a restraining order.” We do not understand this statement of counsel in this assignment of error, for nowhere in the record does it appear that a restraining order was issued, but, on the contrary, it affirmatively appears that an injunction was issued. The only evidence in this case as to the character of the injunctional relief sought in the district court is the order of the district judge dissolving the injunction. The order is found on page 7 of the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solts v. Southwestern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. City of Shawnee v. SlankardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  4. Herron v. M. Rumley Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Clinton Nat. Bank v. McKennonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Irwin v. IrwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Conwill v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Jones v. Citizens' State BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Neil v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. Hargrove v. BourneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API