Robinson v. Glass
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Clark Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The rule has long prevailed that to make available an erroneous refusal to continue a cause, the refusal must be assigned as a reason for a new trial. Kent v. Law*212son, 12 Ind. 675; Bratton v. Bratton, 79 Ind. 588; Swan v. Clark, 80 Ind. 57; Continental L. Ins. Co. v. Kessler, 84 Ind. 310. It has also been long settled that it is not proper to assign as error matters properly embraced by the causes stated in the motion for a new trial.
The question of the correctness of the ruling denying a continuance is, in this case, properly raised by the second specification in the assignment of errors,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Gatling v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Clodfelter v. HulettIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Kent v. LawsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
- Nebeker v. CutsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Matlock v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Plymale v. UprightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Ray v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Biberstine v. New York Blower Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Wagner v. National Life Ins. Co. of MontpelierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.