Legal Opinion

Weaver v. Bishop

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1988No. A039729PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ANDERSON, P. J.

This action was originally brought by Donald and Virginia Weaver to recover damages for the erosion of their property in St. Helena. Named as defendants were respondents Richard and Wanda Bishop, who were alleged to have unreasonably altered the flow of Sulphur Springs Creek, causing damage to the Weavers’ property on the opposite side of the creek. Appellant National American Insurance Company of California (NAIC) intervened in the action as subrogee of the Weavers and of the Peppertree Homeowners Association, of which the Weavers were members. According to the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. San Gabriel Valley Country Club v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Locklin v. City of LafayetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Jordan v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Grundy v. Brack Family TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Grundy v. Brack Family TrustCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API