Legal Opinion

Jordan v. City of Santa Barbara

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 3, 1996No. B090198PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE (S. J.), P. J.

Appellant landowners filed an action against respondent public agencies claiming that respondents’ activities have increased the salinity of appellants’ groundwater, thereby causing them to suffer crop losses and reduced land value. They also claimed that discharge of effluents into the river by sewage treatment facilities operated by respondents City of Lompoc and Vandenberg Village Community Services District caused excessive growth of vegetation in the river channel which caused potential flood problems. After an eight-week trial, the trial court ruled against…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. City of Barstow v. Mojave Water AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. National Council Against Health Fraud, Inc. v. King Bio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Toigo v. Town of RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board v. Handlery Hotel, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API