Grundy v. Brack Family Trust
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtVan Deren, C.J.
¶1 The parties ask us to fashion new law regarding seawater and bulkheads. The Bracks1 ask us to create an exception to trespass law for seawater, similar to the common enemy doctrine, which our Supreme Court in Grundy v. Thurston County, 155 Wn.2d 1, 10, 117 P.3d 1089 (2005) expressly held to be inapplicable to seawater. Evelyn Grundy asks us to articulate a rule that would essentially require that all property owners along Puget Sound and, necessarily, along all ocean shores, construct bulkheads the same height as their neighbors’ bulkheads to avoid trespass liability for waves splashing…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1985
- Borland v. Sanders Lead Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Lamb v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1887
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Darlington Ofuasia Et Al., Appellants, v. Dana William Smurr Et Al., RespondentsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
- Pearson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Sargent v. Seattle Police DeparmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Sargent v. SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- James v. Adams v. Washington State Dept Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.