Hand v. H & R Block, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
J. Fred Jones, Justice.
This is an appeal by Ferd Hand from a declaratory judgment holding that Ark. Stat. Ann. § 70-802 (Supp. 1973) did not apply to a franchise existing between Hand and the appellee H & R Block, Inc. and, consequently, it was not necessary to pass on the constitutionality of § 70-802. The appellant urges three points on which he relies for reversal designated as follows:
“The lower court erred in holding section 70-802 inapplicable to the subject franchise agreement because the plain meaning of the language of the statute requires it to apply to the subject franchise…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Craighead Electric Cooperative Corp. v. Craighead CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- East Poinsett County School District No. 14 v. MasseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Brennan v. White Cnty.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.