Legal Opinion

Jegley v. Picado

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 5, 2002No. 01-815PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

This appeal involves a constitutional challenge to the Arkansas sodomy statute at Ark. Code Ann. § 5-14-122 (Repl. 1997). Appellant Larry Jegley, acting in his official capacity as prosecuting attorney for the Sixth Judicial District, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, was sued by appellee Elena Picado and six other gay and lesbian Arkansas citizens. Appellees seek a declaratory judgment that this state’s sodomy statute is unconstitutional and an injunction against future enforcement of the statute. They assert that the statute violates…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Lake View School District No. 25 v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API